hi everyone
hmmm was experementing a little with my O2 lately with image formats and this is what i notice.
.jpeg - loaded two halves at a time with a little delay which looks slow?
.sgi - loaded from bottom to top? or either way, with steps but a bit faster than jpeg
.pic - one time loading, very fast!
all formats uses the same picture with 1600x1024 resolution.
does it mean images using SOFTIMAGE format are fast to be rendered because it utilize the ICE? i thought JPEG should be faster coz O2 has a built-in for JPEGs? or its just for motion JPEG?
also, why did the native .sgi/.rgb format was slow compared to .pic from softimage?
sorry for this noob question
hmmm was experementing a little with my O2 lately with image formats and this is what i notice.
.jpeg - loaded two halves at a time with a little delay which looks slow?
.sgi - loaded from bottom to top? or either way, with steps but a bit faster than jpeg
.pic - one time loading, very fast!
all formats uses the same picture with 1600x1024 resolution.
does it mean images using SOFTIMAGE format are fast to be rendered because it utilize the ICE? i thought JPEG should be faster coz O2 has a built-in for JPEGs? or its just for motion JPEG?
also, why did the native .sgi/.rgb format was slow compared to .pic from softimage?
sorry for this noob question
_________________
(Sakura)
(Sasuke)
(Naruto) ... lil Jesse! (O2 laptop)
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.“ – A. Einstein
J5600, 2 x Mac, 3 x SUN, Alpha DS20E, Alpha 800 5/550, 3 x RS/6000, Amiga 4000 VideoToaster, Amiga4000 -030, 733MHz Sam440 AmigaOS 4.1 update 1. Tandem Himalaya S-Series Nonstop S72000 ServerNet.
my PC is a mess hehe and yes i already tried many options? but all its MJPEG outputs is not SGI compatible