Check this...
About 40% of Americans deny evolution. Sad.
Hope you have recovered from your shockkshuff wrote: Last night when I entered from behind![]()
But this pair of birds - balancing delicately in the tree - is simply beautiful. When did you last shoot something like that?
Oskar45 wrote: Check this...
Apparently you have no idea what photographing wild-life is really all about. But, yes, they two are married for life - most humans aren't capable of that at all...Anyway, when did you last got a shot like that?hamei wrote:Oskar45 wrote: Check this...
Are you sure they are married ? They have that "nooner quicky" look plastered all over their faces ....
josehill wrote: Do you have a flickr stream or something similar where we can see more of your work?
Oskar45 wrote: I would be willing to post one or two other pics though, provided there is any interest in them at all...
: oxygen /
: neon (16xItanium2 1.6, L2 9MB) /
: beryllium
: nitrogen /
: carbon /
: fluorine
: hydrogen (R10k 195, 512Mo) /
: sodium (R5k 180, 512Mo) /
: R5k 180->200 motherboard and PM only
: helium (R10k 195, HighImpact, 160Mo) /
: boron /
: magnesium
4D70GT : hydrogen, my very first one (now property of
musée bolo
and the foundation
mémoires informatiques
)
Oskar45 wrote: Check this...
Martin Steen wrote:Oskar45 wrote: Check this...
It's a very nice picture! Whats the name of those birds?
I sometimes do pictures of vermins, because my wife works at a
government institute for crop science:
Verminity aside (had to google Kartoffelkäfer and Colorado Beetle to find out what those were), peering into their world through the looking glass can be interesting.....Martin Steen wrote: I sometimes do pictures of vermins,
Great shots. Yes, small can be beautiful...how about this mating pair of butterflies [in the spirit of the present thread]?recondas wrote: [...]peering into their world through the looking glass can be interesting.....
The occasional wildlife photo in the Everything Else forum is nice, but my humble opinion (humble because I don't bear the expense of the forum or the effort of the behind the scenes maintenance) would be to leave our exposure as just that - occasional.Oskar45 wrote:recondas wrote: PS: As moderator, could you perhaps convince Neko to set aside some gallery for such shots? Up to now, you, Martin and myself have posted a few wild-life pics - but surely others want to do it as well...
recondas wrote:The occasional wildlife photo in the Everything Else forum is nice, but my humble opinion (humble because I don't bear the expense of the forum or the effort of the behind the scenes maintenance) would be to leave our exposure as just that - occasional.Oskar45 wrote:recondas wrote: PS: As moderator, could you perhaps convince Neko to set aside some gallery for such shots? Up to now, you, Martin and myself have posted a few wild-life pics - but surely others want to do it as well...
At a resolution large enough to appreciate their beauty, I wouldn't doubt that just a small portion of the finer examples of just your work could consume gigabytes of storage space. Add in several talented photographers and it quickly becomes expensive in a number of areas, not the least of which would be hardware and administrative labor.
There are other publicly available venues that generate sufficient revenue to support photo-hosting. They probably remain the better choice.
Oskar45 wrote:Great shots. Yes, small can be beautiful...how about this mating pair of butterflies [in the spirit of the present thread]?recondas wrote: [...]peering into their world through the looking glass can be interesting.....
_PH17801_neko.jpg